PM Transcripts

Transcripts from the Prime Ministers of Australia

Howard, John

Period of Service: 11/03/1996 - 03/12/2007
Release Date:
19/04/1999
Release Type:
Interview
Transcript ID:
11071
Released by:
  • Howard, John Winston
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER THE HON JOHN HOWARD MP PRESS CONFERENCE PARLIAMENT HOUSE, CANBERRA SUBJECTS: East Timor, Meeting with Habibie

E&OE.......................................................................................

PRIME MINISTER:

I spoke to the Indonesian President Dr Habibie earlier this afternoon

and it was a very useful and candid discussion. I told him that Australia

respected very much the leadership he had taken earlier this year

in announcing a change of Indonesian Government policy regarding East

Timor, and that I was calling him as a friend and as the leader of

a country that had very close and friendly relations with Indonesia,

and that therefore because we have those friendly relations and against

the backdrop of those relations I could speak to him very openly and

very candidly in conveying the concern of the Australian Government,

and I am sure the concern of the Australian people about developments

in Timor.

I told him that I and the Australian Government were very deeply concerned

about recent developments in East Timor, particularly the recent killings.

I noted that we had called for restraint on all sides but I said that

there was a strong and inescapable impression in Australia that ABRI

had not done enough to discourage the violence and discourage the

killings. That ABRI had primary responsibility for maintaining security

in Indonesia and that quite plainly that responsibility in East Timor

had not been properly discharged.

I told him that the damage that could flow to Indonesia's international

reputation as a consequence of these developments was significant

and that it was important to us as a friend of Indonesia that that

damage not be aggravated.

In response the Indonesian President said that he appreciated my call

and he appreciated the frank way in which I had put the concerns of

the Australian Government. He shared my concern about the development

in Timor that he had taken action today in Jakarta to call upon those

involved to cease their acts of violence. He has given certain instructions

to the Indonesian Security Forces regarding that, and that he would

obviously be discussing the matter with his colleagues at a cabinet

meeting which he was about to join after our discussion had taken

place.

He confirmed the strong determination of the Indonesian Government

to go ahead with the UN sponsored consultation on autonomy for East

Timor and he reiterated that he saw a very important role for Australia

in this.

We both agreed that the direct and immediate discussion between us

in such a frank way has been very useful, and we agreed at my suggestion

that we should meet within the next week if possible - probably in

Bali - to further our discussions regarding this issue and I will

probably be accompanied by Mr Downer and Mr Moore. Mr Downer and the

Indonesian Foreign Minister, Mr Alitas are already beginning to make

arrangements. The meeting will take place as soon as possible. It

probably can't be before the weekend or early next week because

Mr Alitas will be attending a United Nations meeting in New York.

He will be leaving Jakarta to go to New York tomorrow.

The President readily agreed to my suggestion that we should meet

and further our discussion, and it will be an opportunity to emphasise

a number of things. To emphasise the concern that the Australian Government

feels about the situation in East Timor, and I don't want anybody

to be left in doubt, in any doubt we believe that the situation has

deteriorated sharply, and that is why I spoke as I did yesterday,

it is why I spoke to the Indonesian President today, and it is why

I propose that we meet as soon as possible to further discuss the

matter.

It is also an indication of course that the relationship between the

two countries remains , and I stress between the two countries, remains

very close, that there are obvious demands placed on a relationship

when public criticism is offered of the conduct of the armed forces

in one country by the leader of another country. But it is nonetheless

a very strong and durable relationship. We have been a good friend

of Indonesia's over the past year or two. We've supported

them economically, we've argued their case in the face of some

rather peremptory and insensitive responses from some who would have

sought to impose a more severe economic solution. I expressed to the

President today my feeling that Indonesia had been delivered a particularly

unfair and difficult international economic hand, and that Indonesia

had suffered more than she deserved as far as the economic downturn

was concerned.

I think that the opportunity that the meeting between us affords for

a furtherance of our discussion today is very important. Its an opportunity

for me to put very directly our concerns and discuss Indonesian responses,

recognising of course that Indonesia has sovereignty over East Timor,

that there is a commitment from the Indonesian Government that there

will be a proper act of self-determination. I have no doubt that Dr

Habibie remains very strongly committed to allowing that act of self-determination

to take place and he is very strongly committed to the consultation

process. Obviously that can't be achieved whilst the fighting

goes on and obviously the call that he has made today in Indonesia

for people to cease hostilities and to put aside their arms, is from

his point of view and earnest of his good intentions, and he does

intend to involve the International Red Cross in providing relief

work for people who have been caught up in the violence. The violence

has been ugly. There has been a very significant loss of life. They

are distressing developments. It's important that Australia play

a constructive role and as a close friend of Indonesia's, our

role surely is to speak frankly but fairly, to offer our counsel,

to offer our understanding but also as is appropriate in a close relationship

between two countries not to be reluctant to express a strong point

of view if the circumstances require it.

I would expect that we would meet sometime in the next week or ten

days, probably in Bali and that the arrangements would be made by

Mr Downer and Mr Alitas. I will be accompanied on that visit by both

the Foreign Minister and the Defence Minister.

JOURNALIST:

Did you specifically ask Dr Habibie about disarming these militias

and if so, did he respond?

PRIME MINISTER:

He indicated that he was taking steps to get everybody involved, I

think the best way I can paraphrase his response, to put aside their

arms.

JOURNALIST:

[Inaudible]

PRIME MINISTER:

Well let me put it this way, there was no serious difference between

us during the discussion.

JOURNALIST:

Given the role of ABRI in this, would you hope or expect that General

Wiranto would also take part in the talks as Defence Minister.

PRIME MINISTER:

Well that is a matter for Dr Habibie. It is not for me to say who

should comprise his party in the meeting. But the fact that I will

be taking our Defence Minister probably indicates that the same could

well be the case on the Indonesian side. But I can't say who

is going in the party.

JOURNALIST:

Are you confident that Dr Habibie has genuine control of the Indonesian

Armed Forces?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well Dr Habibie has as the political head of that country has ultimate

responsibility and clearly my remarks of yesterday and today indicate

that I am unhappy, the Government is unhappy, with the behaviour of

ABRI and there's been a clear transmission of our view that ABRI

must accept responsibility for the aggregate security of Indonesia

including of course the security situation in East Timor and Dr Habibie

certainly today made it very plain that he was unhappy with the situation

in East Timor and he recognised and understood our concern.

JOURNALIST:

What inference should we draw from the fact that you are taking the

Defence Minister with you?

PRIME MINISTER:

No inference other than that is entirely appropriate, that on a meeting

like this you have available to you all the relevant ministers who

may be helpful.

JOUNRALIST:

What do you hope to practically achieve at the meeting with Dr Habibie?

PRIME MINISTER:

The most important thing is an opportunity to underline the concern

we have about what is happening. The fact that we are concerned but

we're also a friend, that this is a very difficult time for Indonesia.

It's a particularly difficult time for the people of East Timor.

This is our part of the world. We are seen by the rest of the world

as having a particular involvement in this part of the world and it

would be very strange indeed in a situation which has clearly deteriorated

if the Prime Minister of Australia and the President of Indonesia,

given the long history of relations between the two countries, were

not to meet and to have a discussion about it. I would hope that I

would be able to drive home to, or put as strongly as possible to,

the Indonesian Government the concerns that we have. I would hope

that out of the meeting there would be an unmistakable and unambiguous

understanding of how we feel, but also we would be transmitting that

feeling against a background of being a friend - not necessarily an

uncritical friend - but a friend of Indonesia's. And it is still

very much in the short, medium and long-term interests of Australia

that we maintain a frank and open and close relationship with Indonesia.

We have been able to achieve that...or preserve that through some

very difficult times over the last few years, and it would be a very

strange Australian government at this difficult time that did not

see it appropriate for the Australian Prime Minister and the Indonesian

President to meet and talk about these things which are of such direct

relevance to both countries and to our region.

JOURNALIST:

Have you been talking to other countries trying to get them to apply

pressure on Indonesia to restrain ABRI?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well let me say this, the only country I've spoken to today has

been Indonesia. I don't rule out some contact with representatives

of other countries either by myself, or more particularly by the Foreign

Minister. But we're not involved in some kind of international

ganging up. We're involved in a process of putting our view as

a close neighbour and a friend and a nation that has developed a particular

and very positive relationship with Indonesia, but also a country

that's very concerned about the deteriorating situation in East

Timor and the damage it is inflicting obviously on the people of East

Timor, the damage it's inflicting on Indonesia's international

reputation. And also, out of a natural concern to make a positive

contribution.

JOUNRALIST:

Did you put directly to Dr Habibie that you believe that ABRI has

been arming the militias within East Timor?

PRIME MINISTER:

The words I used, as best I can paraphrase them, is that there was

an unmistakable impression in Australia that ABRI was turning a blind

eye. I didn't specifically use the words that you have just used,

but to use the same expression again there was an unmistakable conveying

in my conversation of the concern that I have about the role of ABRI.

I mean I don't think we should sort of get hung up on a semantic

debate about how you describe the role. Clearly the role has not been

satisfactory when you put it that way and the Australian Government

is unhappy with it and that is why I said what I did yesterday and

it's why I spoke to him today, and it's why I proposed to

continue the discussion at our meeting.

JOUNRALIST:

...the Australian and Indonesian defence forces which have been

close, any way that can be used positively in East Timor?

PRIME MINISTER:

In a situation like this Dennis I think you would use all contacts

to urge restraint, to urge moderation. You've got to remember

that ABRI is quite a large organisation and there are some signs of

dis-aggregation in the command structure and therefore you can't

always assume that everything that happens in the name of ABRI in

certain parts of Indonesia is necessarily at the direct behest or

the direction of the central authority. Now that is a matter for Indonesia

and that's the responsibility of Indonesia. But we are willing

to use all of the contacts that we have at different levels to convey

our concern and to urge a change. I do want to make the point that

Dr Habibie did show a great deal of leadership in changing Indonesian

policy on Timor. He was not without his critics domestically in his

own country when he changed that policy. He deserves credit, he deserves

a lot of credit for that and he deserves respect for the leadership

that he showed on that issue, and I'm sure that he remains very

sincere about the act of choice, or self-determination, or whatever

you want to call it. The involvement of the United Nations, the involvement

of Australia and other countries in the supervisory process under

the egis of the United Nations. He's very committed to that.

In all of it I think it's important. Although we have a lot of

concern about what has happened over the last 48 hours, it is very

important that we recognise, given the history and the background

of Indonesia's relationship with Timor, just how significant

were his actions earlier this year in changing his Government's

policy.

JOUNRALIST:

Did you get any sense today that the President was unhappy with or

frustrated by the actions of ABRI? You've expressed Australia's

unhappiness. Did we meet that?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well we spoke for about 20 minutes or so on the phone, 15 or 20 minutes.

I put my concerns, he responded. I've tried to describe his response

and we've agreed to meet. The fact that he has agreed to meet

me indicates that he understands our concern and that he sees it as

something that is very important, I don't know that I ought to

try and parse and analyse the every nuance of his response.

JOURNALIST:

Given your concerns over what is happening with ABRI, would you support

an outside supervisory force moving into East Timor?

PRIME MINISTER:

Oh, look, Indonesia has sovereignty over East Timor and sovereignty

carries both authority and responsibility. And the point that I emphasise

in these matters is that when you have sovereignty and you have the

authority that goes with sovereignty you also have the responsibility

that goes with sovereigny. I think it's quite counter- productive

to be talking about substitute outside supervisory forces at this

time.

JOURNALIST:

...pro-integrationist forces can't be disarmed or can't

be brought under control then can Australian afford to sit by and

watch a slaughter.....

PRIME MINISTER:

Look I, look you know, the worst thing to do in a situation like this

is to respond in a knee-jerk way to every hypothesis. And one thing

at a time. We're going to have a discussion and there are Australian

interests, there are world interests, there are regional interests

and there are bilateral interests in this situation. Naturally the

Australian interest is best met by my putting our view very directly

which I've done, talking to the Indonesian President. I'm

not going to make this country or any of the resources of this country

willy-nilly hostile to a particular outcome. I think it is very important

that countries measure their responses and work out in advance what

their capacity is to influence events if the course of action they're

currently following doesn't work. I don't think it's

a good idea to sort of telegraph in advance on a "what if"

kind of scenario what you may or may not do. Two more questions on

this. Well, I – I'm sorry – I haven't had one

from you, no.

JOURNALIST:

Just to clarify Prime Minister, could you just clarify for us, did

Dr Habibie acknowledge that ABRI was or may have been complicit in

the events of the weekend?

PRIME MINISTER:

He did not dissent from the view that I put. I want you to understand

what I'm saying.

JOURNALIST:

(inaudible) whether he acknowledged....?

PRIME MINISTER:

No, well, I mean, please, it's not appropriate that any words

be put into his mouth or mine on an issue such as this. I put a point

of view and his response essentially was well I appreciate the candour

with which you have expressed your view.

JOURNALIST:

And he didn't directly give you his view about that?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, I don't intend to say any more than that. I don't

think it is appropriate or helpful.

JOURNALIST:

Prime Minister, how soon now do you think that it will be possible

to have civilian UN personnel on the ground in Timor given the deal

that's on the table in New York later this week.

PRIME MINISTER:

Very difficult given what has happened in the last forty-eight hours

for me to give a helpful response at the moment to that – I don't

know.

JOURNALIST:

What do you think these events have done to the timetable for....?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well it's too early to make that judgement. They've obviously

not helped the timetable, but can I say again that Dr Habibie was

insistent today about his commitment to the UN involvement and the

process. He really sounded to me very committed to it and a person

who is quite prepared to work very hard and very strenuously to bring

it about.

JOURNALIST:

What did Senator Tierney mean this morning when he said that the Government

was still discussing the tax scale and ‘I think at the end of

the day we're going to end up with a much fairer package'.

Is he saying that the package is going to changed to be much fairer?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, the Government hasn't been discussing the scales, it's

a very fair package. The Government's position was made very

plain yesterday on television by me and it's been made very plain

by the Treasurer in an article in a newspaper this morning and our

position remains that the Senate processes – I haven't seen

their latest offering because I've been at other meetings this

afternoon – is it out yet? No. Our position is that no indentation

of consequence has been made in the package through the Senate processes.

JOURNALIST:

(inaudible) saying it could be made much fairer?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well it's a very fair package and people from time to time express

their point of view in a free party. We're not a gathering of

Stalinists.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Howard, you talked about fine-tuning yesterday. Could you elaborate

in what area or areas you see a possibility of such fine-tuning?

PRIME MINISTER:

No.

JOURNALIST:

Would compensation be fine-tuning?

PRIME MINISTER:

Our position is as I've described it and I'm not going to

be further drawn, I'm not going to further speculate. It is a

fair package, I've always said that. We're not going to

alter the essential thrust, we're not taking out food. I've

never ruled out fine-tuning, you're not going to start getting

me speculating, hypothesising, musing, ruminating, or anything else

of that kind in any other way.

Thank you.

11071