PM Transcripts

Transcripts from the Prime Ministers of Australia

Howard, John

Period of Service: 11/03/1996 - 03/12/2007
Release Date:
26/06/1998
Release Type:
Speech
Transcript ID:
10948
Released by:
  • Howard, John Winston
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER THE HON JOHN HOWARD MP ADDRESS AT THE COMMUNITY LUNCH ANGLICAN PARISH HALL MARYBOROUGH, QUEENSLAND

E&OE...............................................................................................................................

Well, thank you very much, Mr Mayor, for your very warm words of welcome;

to Warren Truss, David MacGibbon, Ian Macdonald, Mr Kingston, other

distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.

This is my first visit, as the Mayor said, to Maryborough as Prime

Minister. Not my first visit to Maryborough but certainly the first

as Prime Minister. I'm in this area for a day and a half or a

little less than a day and a half - it seems a lot longer because

I've been to a lot of functions - and it's an exercise in

talking, in listening, in exchanging ideas, of getting some advice,

of receiving some criticism. In other words, it's an exercise

in accountable democracy.

I've said at the other gatherings I've addressed that I

personally enjoy public gatherings. I still believe they are the best

form of political dialogue that you can have in our community.

I won't beat about the bush. I'll acknowledge that for some

time there have been significant concerns in regional Australia. There

are many people who feel economically vulnerable and insecure because

of economic and social change. I also know that the level of unemployment

in this area, in the Wide Bay electorate which Warren represents,

is very high indeed, particularly youth unemployment.

Some of this has come about as a result of the impact of particular

decisions. A lot of it has come about as a consequence of fundamental

economic change. What I believe all people in political life should

do, whether they are in the Government or they're not in the

Government - and there's an equal obligation on all of us. There

is no such thing as a non-participating politician. We're all

on the same field and we're all playing according to the same

rules. And we all have responsibilities to address issues, to analyse

the reasons why problems have arisen and to try and put forward solutions.

We also have an obligation to be candid enough, when people speak

to us, not to pretend that there's an instant, immediate solution

when clearly there isn't. And I learnt very early in my political

life that there's no point in kidding people. There's no

point in going to some remote part of Australia and promising the

earth and saying that if only you were given the chance, you could

solve the problem, and then scuttling back to Canberra and writing

somebody a letter saying: well, I've had a look at it and unfortunately

I can't do that. There are people I've met over the last

few hours who I have said: look, I don't have any ready answer

to your particular problem. But there are others where I believe that

we can help.

Much of Australia's economic foundation, despite the difficulties

of people in many areas of our country, is very sound. I hope I can

say to you that, in terms of our inflation rate, our interest rate

structure, our budget position, our level of investment and despite

the difficulties of the Asian economic downturn, the Australian economy

overall is in quite good health. But, in a sense, that only makes

the difficulty of isolated, vulnerable communities even more acute

because you find it difficult to understand how it is, that if the

overall shape of the Australian economy is sound, why is it that you

will have, in particular areas of the country, why you will have difficulty.

And that, of course, is something that I'm very conscious of.

Now, what the Government has endeavoured to do over the last two and

a quarter years is to strengthen those foundations. And I say very

proudly, in defence of the Government's record, that we have

been able to get our interest rates to a level that they haven't

been at for 30 years. Not all of you will have got the benefit of

that. Some of you will have. And I say to you that if we hadn't

have got those interest rates down there would have been a lot more

small businesses going to the wall and a lot more people out of work

and a lot more difficulty and a lot more dislocation. And you can't

separate the reduction that we've achieved in interest rates

from some of the difficult decisions we've taken on the budget

front. Because you can't run a huge budget deficit. You can't

print money to finance a budget deficit. That's highly irresponsible

and highly inflationary and undermines the confidence of people in

their savings and the economic stability of the nation. Nobody can

do that with any sense of responsibility. So you have to see the link

between the decisions we've taken, some of which you haven't

liked, over the last two and a quarter years and the benefits that

we have derived from those decisions. And the same applies to further

change.

One of the paradoxes of Australia's position at the moment is

that some people are simultaneously unhappy, and I understand why,

with the pace of change but also they're unhappy that some things

they would like to see changed are not being changed quickly enough.

I mean one of my frustrations as Prime Minister, over the last two

and a quarter years, has been that the Government has not had the

numbers in the Senate to put through legislation that it regards as

important and the Australian people in March of 1996 regarded as important.

We're still, for example, discussing the issue of amending the

Native Title Act two and a quarter years after the election.

And the reason for that is that we haven't been able to get it

through the Labor Party and the Democrats and others in the Senate.

It took us much longer than we would have liked to have got other

necessary legislation through. But I have to live with that because

that was the verdict of the Australian people under our political

system. And no politician has a right to say to the electorate: well,

you were wrong - so far as the outcome of an election is concerned.

The obligation is that if you think the electorate's wrong is

to persuade them next time they vote, to vote in a different direction.

You have to accept the umpire's verdict.

And over the last two and a quarter years we have worked very hard

to stabilise and strengthen the fundamentals of our economy. And there

are other things we need to do in that area. And one of them is that

we do need to change our taxation system. Now, I know there are a

few people outside who disagree with that. I know the Labor Party

disagrees with changing our tax system. I know that other political

parties on the horizon are against changing our taxation system. Well,

I disagree with them because I think the present system's very

unfair. The present system does place a very heavy burden on our exporters

because the exporters bear input taxation which would not be there

if you had a different taxation system and it makes them less competitive

with other countries. The present taxation system's very lop-sided.

You don't pay any wholesale sales tax on a lot of items and you

pay very high rates on others. The present taxation system does contain

a lot of areas where, if you earn a bit more, you go on to a sharply

higher taxation level. And the present taxation system contains a

lot of disincentives for extra effort.

We think it's important for Australia's economic future

that it be changed. We're not interested in changing it just

for its own sake. We think it's good for Australia to change

it and that's why we're pressing ahead with that reform.

And I can assure you that when the details are released, which will

be soon, you will see that we are protecting the low income earners

in the Australian community. I do not intend, as Prime Minister, to

preside over a tax reform plan that will hurt the poor or the vulnerable.

But I do want to preside over a taxation plan that will deliver much

greater incentive to ordinary wage and salary earners and also a system

that will make it harder for people to cheat and also a system that

ensures that everybody makes their fair contribution.

I know that there's a lot of concern in a number of rural industries.

I've received a lot of representations from people representing

the pork industry in recent weeks. We gave a $10 million package late

in 1997 to help reconstruction of that industry. And after my meeting

with representatives of the industry at Toowoomba a few weeks ago

we agreed to a number of other plans that involved a further contribution

of between $9 million and $11 million.

Now, I've had some views put to me today, they were put to me

last night as well, to the effect that there needs to be a further

addressing of that issue. Some things we can do and some things we

can't do. Not speaking specifically of the pork industry but

speaking generally of how we react to industries that are in difficulty

in this country, there's one thing we mustn't do and that

is that we must never turn our back on world markets. And there is

no section of the Australian community that should be more conscious

of that than people who live in regional Australia.

I've just been to Walkers. Now, that magnificent company employs

600 Australians here in Maryborough and it is a living example of

the critical importance of not turning our back on the world. Because

many of those carriages are sold to Asian countries. I was told about

the hoax they have to get a contract to sell into Hong Kong. I was

shown the cars that are going to be sold into Malaysia in time for

the Commonwealth Games. Now, that was a living example, a perfect

example, of how important it is to maintain those trading links with

the world. It was also living proof of the wisdom of our Government's

decision to give some help to some of the ailing Asian economies last

year. I know that was criticised. Some of our political opponents

criticised it and said we shouldn't have done it. The reason

we did it was because it was good for Australia. Because if you have

a weak, collapsing Malaysian economy or a weak, collapsing economy

in any part of the world that buys from us, they can't buy from

us any more. And to let economies go down the drain through some sort

of misplaced xenophobic view of the world is to cut off one's

nose to spite the face. We send 34 per cent of our total exports as

a country to Japan and Korea alone. Those two countries alone take

34 per cent of Australia's exports. And if we don't nurture

those links and we don't make certain that those links are preserved

then we could lose them. And if we take arbitrary, foolish trade action

in relation to imports coming into Australia, then other countries

are going to retaliate and take action against our exports. And that

is a view that is very, very well understood by such bodies as the

representatives of the sugar industry and the representatives of the

beef industry.

Now, I just mention that to make the point that the answer to our

problems is not to turn inwards, is not to say: well, stop the world,

I want to get off. You can't do that. The world won't allow

you to do it and Australia last of all countries and regional Australia

which is really the backbone of our primary production exporting potential.

It is the last part of Australia that should adopt that kind of attitude.

Because so much of what we send abroad comes from rural and regional

Australia. And I know the pain and the frustration, I understand the

pain and frustration of farmers. Australia has the most efficient

farmers in the world and all the while those farmers are fighting

corrupt world markets. But the way to fight corrupt world markets

is to keep trying to prize them open. It is not to say to other countries

that we no longer want your imports because if you say we no longer

want your imports they will say we no longer want your exports and

we end up being a very, very big loser, as a consequence of that.

We are going through a time of transition. And it is very important

at a time like this that we try and get a balance between preserving

what is good about our past, but also recognising that we have to

make changes if we are to secure our future. And there is much about

Australia's past of which I am, and I know everybody in this

hall today is very proud, the fact that we have the most authentic

participatory democracy in the world. There aren't many countries

in the world where you can have this sort of activity. You get a few

heckles, you get a few boos, you get a few placards. That's fair

enough, that's part of the process. It goes with the territory

as the saying is. But at least we can do it. And we can do it in a

frank, equal way and that's very much part of Australia's

egalitarian past. And I want to hang on to that. I don't want

any of that changed. If anything, we need to reclaim a bit more of

that because it's one of the things that we do very well and

this method of political exchange is infinitely better than the rather

more antiseptic methods that we find increasingly we use.

There are other things about our past that we need to hang on to and

we should never change things just for the sake of changing. As you

know I've been, all my political life, a very strong supporter

of the Australian flag. Now I'm a supporter of the Australian

flag because I think it represents our history and our being and I

see absolutely no reason to change it and that's why the Government

when it came into office passed the amendment to the Flag Act so it

couldn't be changed without every Australian having a say at

a referendum. And if they want to change it in the future through

that process, well that's fair enough.

But those sorts of things you should preserve and value and you should

never denigrate or be ashamed of. But equally there are other things

that do have to change because the world in which we live is now different.

We've tried to change our industrial relations system. We set

out to make changes on the Australian waterfront. We were criticised.

Not everything we wanted to achieve was achieved. But I can say an

enormous amount was. And people who once again who live in rural Australia

will know the benefits of a more efficient waterfront. And many of

you will know the pain and anguish of your produce being held up on

the wharves and after you've worked your butt off through a difficult

season to see it held up at the wharves is just adding insult to injury

and pain. We set out to do that and that has to change. We can't

live with an industrial relations system that was developed before

World War I.

And so it is that we are living in a world where, whether we like

it or not, what we do is judged by investors in other parts of the

world and we have to ensure that this country is always receptive

to overseas investment. I know that some of you think that foreign

investment, that some of it is a waste of time. Could I say to you

that no country that has developed a standard of living that Australia

has developed with a population of 18 million can sustain that standard

of living without having a large amount of foreign investment. Because

we don't generate enough savings of our own to do all the things

we want to do. So you have essentially a choice. You either accept

a lower standard of living because you don't have enough savings

to produce the investment for that standard of living. Or you take

the savings of foreigners. You borrow from overseas. You take their

investment. And walk down the main street of any city or town in Australia

and you will see some evidence where foreign companies have invested

in this place, and have employed Australians. You see names like Toyota

and Ford.

You think, as I mentioned this morning, of the birth of the motor

manufacturing industry in Australia, where legend has it that Ben

Chifley went around Australian companies and said: "Would you

start a motor manufacturing industry in Australia?" And they

said: no we won't. So he invited General Motors and Ford, Chrysler

to come into this country.

And if you look at the history of the United States the railroads

there were built in the 19th Century essentially with British and

German capital. And if you look at the history of any country that

has developed the way that Australia has. Now you need rules, you

need requirements, once again as I mentioned this morning at Hervey

Bay I can remember almost twenty years ago when I was Treasurer having

some arguments with a well known former premier of Queensland about

the level of Australian equity in some coal mines in Queensland. And

I took the view that if you could get 50 per cent Australian equity

you should. Our foreign investment is always operated on that basis

that if the Australian equity is there, it ought to be injected. But

there are many cases there's no Australian equity available so

you've got a choice between taking the investment and the jobs

that come with it, or once again cutting off the nose to spite the

face.

Now, I mention these things, ladies and gentlemen, because they're

issues that are being debated now in a way that perhaps they haven't

been debated before. And I think it's very important that when

propositioned to put forward that sound all right on the surface that

they be questioned and challenged. And the value of what is now being

done be preserved. That doesn't mean to say that everything that

is now happening is correct. That doesn't mean to say that you

can't make changes. It doesn't mean to say that in the process

of my going around our country and listening to the views of people

there aren't insights and attitudes that shouldn't be taken

account of and I certainly do. Politics, successful state-craft is

very much a process of keeping your own goals and moving towards them

but understanding that you need to take people with you. And also

accepting as you go on that journey that from time to time you'll

get things wrong and you need to alter them. And I've never been

reluctant in my political career to admit error. I've never been

reluctant in my political career to acknowledge that it isn't

possible to do something different. But I've also been very determined

in my political career to hang on to those things that I think are

important. Those values that I regard as important and to maintain

the momentum towards policy reform that I regard as important.

A number of people have spoken to me this morning about the importance

of small business in Maryborough. They've spoken to me about

the despair in relation to the young people in this community. There

was one single thing I wished one could do overnight but I can't.

And nobody can. And that is to remove the blithe of youth unemployment.

You can patiently work at it. You can produce, as we have, a new apprenticeship

and training system that has produced 200,000 traineeships and apprenticeships

over the last 2 years. You can make other changes to the climate

to small business. Changes to capital gains tax. Changes to provisional

tax. Reductions in interest rates, all of which make circumstances

a little more congenial for small business. You can try and further

reform the unfair dismissal laws, which I know have discouraged many

small business men and women around Australia from employing people.

And unfortunately our changes in that department are held up in the

Senate by the opposition parties and it's one of the pieces of

legislation that I have felt an immense frustration about over the

last two and a quarter years.

We can improve the operation of our labour placement system. And we've

introduced a new system called the job network in that department.

But ladies and gentlemen, I don't pretend that I've come

here today with every solution to every problem that you have. I don't

think that will ever be possible. I acknowledge the fact that people

feel a sense of detachment from what they see as some elements of

mainstream politics in Australia. And when that happens I think people

who are part of that mainstream have got to examine why and where

they see the concerns of people justified you respond and where they

are not you put your own case with increased vigour and increased

determination and that is what I have been doing over the last few

days and what I intend to do over the weeks and months ahead. I think

people do feel a sense of, I think anger at the confrontational style

of some of Australian politics. I don't know that they're

always impressed every night when they turn on their television with

point scoring arguments. I think they would rather see something different.

I think that is a message I have got very directly and very loudly

from the Australian community.

Now I can assure you, despite what you see on your televisions, that

there is a lot of legislation that goes through Parliament in a very

uneventful way. And in lightness, in harmony and sweetness. It's

true. No. No, there are many other things where that happens. But

that's not terribly good copy. I mean when everybody says: hey

that's not very exciting television, but if you have a little

bit of a verbal exchange it is. But the point I simply make is that

sometimes the perception of that can be very negative. And perception

is very important. It's very important to the way people form

their views.

But, ladies and gentlemen, I just want to say just two other things

I wouldn't want to let the opportunity go by without very, very

warmly commending to you the tremendous job that the your local Member,

Warren Truss, does as the Federal Member for Wide Bay. Warren is one

of my Minister's. He's done a very, very energetic job as

a Minister, and a very, very enthusiastic job as a representative

of the Wide Bay electorate. And he has been somebody who's been

very vocal in the Party Room in relation to many of the issues that

effect rural and regional Australia. And I am very delighted also

to have on the stage my two Liberal Party Senate colleagues from Queensland

of Ian Macdonald and David MacGibbon.

Finally, friends can I just say again how valuable I find this kind

of encounter. It's an opportunity for you to say what you think.

I've enjoyed moving around talking to people in the last two

meetings doing that and generally exchanging views.

I think every issue affecting Australia's future should be debated

fully and should be debated intelligently and people who seek to represent

their constituents in parliament, all of us, no matter what interest

we represent should be fully accountable for what we say. There's

no such thing, as I said earlier, as a non-political politician. Everybody

is a player upon the political stage who seeks to represent the people

of Australia in the parliaments of Australia. And all of those players

are accountable to the same rules. They must explain, they must defend,

they must advocate, they must justify. Where they deceive and mislead

they should be identified and criticised and where they disappoint

expectations they should enjoy and expect to receive the same judgement.

I always live by that rule myself. I've always tried to be accountable

and I've always accepted the verdict of the people. And I do

thank all of you for coming along today. I've enjoyed very much

meeting you. I wish the city of Maryborough a great success in the

future of its delightful community. I must say it's a stunning

Queensland winter day and I'm told that the weather here over

the past few days has been approaching that of the Federal Capital,

which is quite unusual for Queensland even in the middle of winter.

But it's been very great, it's been very nice being amongst

you and I wish you all well. Thank you very much.

[ENDS]

10948