PM Transcripts

Transcripts from the Prime Ministers of Australia

Transcript 9758

TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER, THE HON P J KEATING MP INTERVIEW WITH GRAHAM WORLD, " AM PROGRAM", ABC RADIO, 15 SPETEMBER 1995

Photo of Keating, Paul

Keating, Paul

Period of Service: 20/12/1991 to 11/03/1996

More information about Keating, Paul on The National Archive website.

Release Date: 15/09/1995

Release Type: Interview

Transcript ID: 9758

(/ 3
PRIME MINISTER
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER, THE HON P J KEATING MP
INTERVIEW WITH GRAHAM WORLD, " AM PROGRAM", ABC RADIO,
SEPTEMBER 1995
E& OE PROOF COPY
At the South Pacific Forum in Papua New Guinea, Mr Keating has said now
that his Health Minister has appeared at the Easton Royal Commission in
Perth, there is not much value in it continuing. He was echoing the sentiments
of Dr Lawrence, who last night resumed her media campaign, calling for the
inquiry to be closed down and adding that it is unlikely to produce a balanced
report. Mr Keating, meanwhile, says he will ignore the Commission's findings.
The Prime Minister spoke to Graham World in Madang last night.
GW: Prime Minister, today's communique will include an endorsed code of
conduct to restrict logging in the region. But it doesn't guarantee that
unsustainable logging practices can be reigned in in countries where it is
going on.
PM: Well nothing can guarantee that. The Pacific Forum is just the sort of
is basically a community advisory organisation. It has no legally binding
strength. But the communique today, was endorsed unanimously by all
the countries the code of conduct for logging and, of course, a year
ago we had a snowball's chance in hell of getting any of this endorsed.
And now it has come back, it has been endorsed by everybody.
Vanuatu is currently taking regulations before their Ministerial Council.
Papua New Guinea is in the position of, I think in the next few months,
being able to adopt the code for their own forestry operations.
GW: What about the Solomons?
PM: Well for the Solomons it has been up to them whether they adopt it, but
they have endorsed it.
GW: On French nuclear testing, would you have expected anything beyond
the extreme outrage that the Forum statement has agreed upon?

PM: Well I don't think there is much else that the Forum can do as it has
already been party to delegations to Paris, it has already expressed
itself in the strongest way in the past. We have now seen one weapon
detonated and it's a case of continuing to keep the pressure on France.
GW: Nauru's President wanted the French Minister for Cooperation excluded
from the post-Forum dialogue to take place in Port Moresby on Monday.
Why not go down that route?
PM: Well there was no support for that because I think for some countries
here, smaller Pacific island states, their only contact with France is
actually through this dialogue point every year. For those, of course,
who have embassies and structured relations with France, it doesn't
matter. But you have got to remember there are many countries that are
very small you know, with just populations of 70,000 and less and
their only contact with France is at post-Forum dialogues. So I think
they took the view they are better to have a link than no link.
GW: Tomorrow you will be attending the 20th Anniversary celebrations for
Papua New Guinea's independence. Would you agree that the
economic difficulties in PNG, in recent years, have placed the bilateral
relationship under more strain than previously?
PM: Oh not as much strain as it would be under had there not been
independence. I mean if it was still basically a trust territory, a colony of
Australia, then we would have a lot more problems than we have ever
had in the period of independence. It was a right step for Australia and
a right step for Papua New Guinea.
GW: We are giving about $ 300 million annually in aid. It is being shifted to
program aid. Isn't one of the difficulties that Australia is dictating to PNG
really how that money should be spent?
PM: No I don't think so. It is just that Papua New Guinea has got now a
revenue base of its own, it is a country that has got a lot of resources,
mining in particular, and it doesn't need the Australian appropriation to
come as budget aid. Rather, we get a better bang for the buck coming
as program aid and the communities can see the immediate impact of
Australian spending in such areas as schools and education and roads.
Whereas, if it goes as a budget, it disappears into the accounts of the
Papua New Guinea Government. So we decided long ago, Australia
I mean, that we would make this transfer from budget aid to program aid
and we are just about half way.
GW: Just finally, while you have been overseas this week, Carmen Lawrence
has appeared before the Royal Commission. You supported her going
there in public statements. But what has she achieved?

PM: Well she has had a chance to put her view in a structured and orderly
way after other people, who have had a counter-view, have had the
opportunity to have their view put and publicised. So I think that is what
she has achieved. What is the value of the Commission after this?
I think not much.
GW: Will her appearance influence the outcome?
PM: I don't know. But given the narrow terms of reference and the political
nature of it, I don't think it matters very much.
GW: So what you are saying, still, is wind up the Commission immediately?
PM: Exactly. I think it was an outrage at the beginning with the terms of
reference the way it was framed and no matter how conscientious the
Commissioner might try to be, one can only work within the terms of
reference a Commissioner is given.
GW: Is Dr Lawrence still a positive selling point for the Government in the
next election?
PM: Well I think she remained that right through the period and I think the
Australian community are quite smart about these things. They know
when there is a lurk on and they know there is an abuse of executive
power here. Royal Commissions are things which have been very
valuable to Australia, very valuable. What Richard Court and
John Howard have sought to do is to trash them as an institution to try
and abuse their powers, the powers of the Royal Commission, to try and
abuse it to seek out an opponent. And, of course, in Richard Court's
case, he was not simply content to defeat Carmen Lawrence at the
election, but he has now tried to destroy her personally. He is very
spiteful and very vindictive and will be, of course, ignored in this
exercise by us.
GW: Prime Minister, thanks for joining us.
PM: Thank you, Graham.
ends

Transcript 9758