PM Transcripts

Transcripts from the Prime Ministers of Australia

Keating, Paul

Period of Service: 20/12/1991 - 11/03/1996
Release Date:
09/05/1995
Release Type:
Interview
Transcript ID:
9568
Document:
00009568.pdf 3 Page(s)
Released by:
  • Keating, Paul John
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER, THE HON P J KEATING MP INTERVIEW WITH RADIO 2UE, 2GB AND ABC NEWS, CANBERRA 9 MAY 1995

A. 3 PRIME MINISTER
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER, THE HON P J KEATING MP
INTERVIEW WITH RADIO 2UE, 2GB AND ABC NEWS, CANBERRA
9 MAY 1995
E& OE PROOF COPY
J: Do you think the markets will believe the bottom line on this Budget?
PM; It's easy enough to believe. The starting point deficit was around $ 6
billion, there are $ 3 billion of discretionary changes by the Government
that's on outlays, spednad receipts and there is then the sale
of Government assets, which improves the structure of those
institutions, and removes long-term public debt-interest effects.
Altogether, $ 6 billion to $ 3 billion, to a surplus of $ 700 million it's all
there in the Budget papers.
J: The Opposition says it's a " fudge-it budget"?
PM: What else can they say? They are left without a feather to fly with
they were presented tonight with a Budget surplus, next year, a Budget
surplus free of any asset sales, and the biggest change in the nation's
history in terms of a private savings plan.
J; Is the extent of the asset sales justified given the Commonwealth Bank
decision?
PM: It improves the institution let's take the Commonwealth Bank what
was it? A couple of years ago, it was the old State Savings Bank of
NSW. Then, we bought the State Bank of Victoria. It is now a real
institution. Then, under this Government, we floated it we sold half of
it, it strengthened in the market, it's share prices strengthened. Sold,
completely, it will then have a strong capital base in the market it is
the right thing to do. It is the right thing to do for the institution -the
right thing to do for the Budget. And it is the same with Qantas
Qantas needs capital that the government can't give it, it has the
chance of being the primary airline in this part of the world of South-
East Asia and why shouldn't it have that chance?

J: Is this an election Budget?
PM: This is a Budget that does as the Treasurer said, quite eloquently: " A
key objective of current policy is to address the national savings
investment balance, while maintaining strong economic growth". What
this Budget does is give the lie to John' Howard's cynical, opportunist
claim about " five minutes of sunshine". We have had now three and a
half years of growth, and the Budget forecasts are forecasting another
3 years. In other words, what is very clear to the Australian people
from this Budget, is that there will be 6 years of continuous growth,
with low inflation, but at the same time, filling that massive savings pothole
which is sitting up there around the late 1990s and the year
2000 with the biggest private change ever with superannuation.
J: Why haven't you gone harder on spending cuts?
PM: We have gone very hard. We have got net spending cuts in the
Budget of $ 700 million, but gross spending cuts of about $ 1500 million.
So, there are $ 1500 million of actual cuts, but there is a lot of new
policy a lot of it is unavoidable new policy, the spending on families,
leaves us with $ 700 million of net spending cuts, and that rises next
year. The key thing is that the $ 3 billion of changes we have in this
year, rises to over $ 4.5 billion next year that is the discretionary
receipts and outlays changes.
J: How do you overcome credibility problems with scrapping the second
round of On e Nation tax cuts, and bring in the superannuation tradeoff?
PM: I don't think there is any credibility problem. If you say to people " what
would they prefer $ 10 or $ 15 in their hands, or the chance to have a
decent income in retirement?". I think you will find in the Budget
papers, for someone on average weekly earnings, who has been in the
workforce for 40 years, they go out with something like $ 0.5 million
dollars. Half a million. That is a person on average weekly earnings.
So if you give that choice to Australians... . remember this the
Government paid and brought forward the first round of tax cuts, and
on this occasion will be paying more than the second round of the One
Nation tax cuts will be paying more. But they are paying it directly
into superannuation accounts, and then that will give all Australians
everyone, particularly the lower income earners a much higher
standard of living in retirement.
J: During the last election, you promised that the company tax rate would
come down to 33 cents in the dollar now you h7Ve -taken ifb-a-k up to
36 cents in the dollar what happened to our international
combativeness?

PM: You remember that at the same time, John Hewson was going to take
the company rate from 39% to 42%. And we had the Business Council
all out there cheering a 42% rate, and we said " don't mind u s we are
going to reduce it to Not a soul gave us a point for it. We did
reduce it to 33% from 39%, but the companies it's the highest level of
profits in Australian history at the moment. And taking that up by 3
cents only to 36 cents is still a long way down from the 46 cents it was
when John Howard left it all those years ago...
J: But they are warning....
PM: . taking it up to 36% will bring in, I think, $ 300 million this year, and
$ 1500 million next year. Now, that is off the massive level of
profitability which companies enjoy, and that is where the burden
should be.
J: But they already warning about jobs growth and employment
prospects.
PM: But who some flapper from the Business council?
J: But what about the tax on motor cars going back up 5% we have
already had the motor traders saying that is going to hurt employment,
particularly in Victoria?
PM: What we did, we reduced it to 15% and 16% in One Nation for the
express purpose of kick-starting the motor industry in the recession. It
did that we are now up to as high a Tevel of s'ales as we have seen,
and now is the time to bring it back. It was cyclical policy then it was
counter-cycle policy then, and it is counter-cycle policy now. In other
words, we took it down when it needed to go down, we are taking it
back up to where it was because now the need has passed. The key
point in all this the Liberals don't know where to go with all this they
are now facing a Budget surplus this year, and a surplus next year
without asset sales or anything, and a massive change for everyone in
the country having 15% put away for their long-term savings. Mr
Howard almost shrivelled up tonight looking at it we have had
nervous giggles, we have had all sorts of rehearsed lines, extravagant
press releases the Liberals know that their cynical line that there was
only going to be 5 minutes of sunshine, and that the Government was
not going to have galloping interest rates, has now fallen for the fact
that it has no truth. And what this will mean with this Budget with this
very great change to fiscal policy, and to long-term savings, much less
pressure on any prospect on interest rate rises.
ends

9568