PM Transcripts

Transcripts from the Prime Ministers of Australia

Howard, John

Period of Service: 11/03/1996 - 03/12/2007
Release Date:
27/08/1998
Release Type:
Speech
Transcript ID:
10950
Released by:
  • Howard, John Winston
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER THE HON JOHN HOWARD MP ADDRESS AT HAWKESBURY SPORTING CLUB NORTH RICHMOND

E&OE................................................................................................

Well thank you very much Kerry Bartlett, to Kevin Rizolli, the Mayor,

other distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.

It is a delight for me to be back in the Hawkesbury. It is a delight

for me to be back in the electorate of Macquarie and to commend to

all of you in the strongest possible way what a tremendous job that

Kerry Bartlett has done as your representative in the National Parliament

since March of 1996.

The first responsibility of a local representative is to pursue the

interests of his or her constituents. And Kerry has certainly done

that, be it constantly pressing the case of the maintenance of the

RAAF base at Richmond as an operational base of the Defence Forces.

And I can say to you this morning that there is no intention on the

part of the Defence Department to close the Richmond base and, in

fact, the Defence Minister has been informing those who bothered to

enquire. And I repeat the assurance he has given that the Defence

position is that it will be operational ‘til at least through

to the year 2010. And given the nature of these things that is a very,

very significant commitment by the RAAF.

Kerry has also been extremely active in pursuing the interests of

self-funded retirees, many of which reside in the electorate of Macquarie.

And it's been in no small measure due to his representations

that we were able in the last budget to announce a very significant

extension of the seniors' card to large sections of the self-funded

retiree population. And when I come in a moment to talk about our

tax plan I'll also have something to say about the provision

in that plan for self-funded retirees. He has also been very active

in pursuing environmental causes and as a result of his representations

there have been significant provisions of funds with more to come

for projects in the Macquarie electorate out of the Natural Heritage

Trust. He's also, as a person with a deep understanding of economic

issues, he's also played a very active role in promoting what

the Government has done to restore the health of the Australian economy.

I don't need to remind any audience in Australia that at the

present time there is a good deal of turmoil on world financial markets,

there is a good deal of international pressure on the Australian economy.

And it is a remarkable thing that the Australian economy has performed

so well and has withstood that pressure so effectively. And of all

the things that I would like, the last two-and-a-half years that the

Coalition Government being in office, to be regarded well it is the

way in which we have handled the Australian economy. We did inherit

an Australian economy that was substantially in the red and in just

over two years we have turned a deficit of $10.5 billion into a surplus.

And we actually did it a year ahead of time.

When we came into power the Federal Government owed $95 billion. By

the turn of the century, that will have been cut by more than half

and, in fact, on present projections by the turn of the century, or

the early years of the next century, we will have the lowest national

debt to GDP ratio that this country has ever had. We have delivered

the lowest interest rates in 30 years. The average homebuyer in Australia

has a mortgage of $100,000 and on that average mortgage that homebuyer

is $300 a month better off than two-and-a-half years ago. And that's

the equivalent of a payrise from the boss of $100 a week. And that

is a very important thing to the average Australian. That's rolled

gold quality benefit to the average Australian because there is nothing

more important still to the average Australian family man or woman

than the acquisition of a family home. And the acquisition of a family

home, and providing through the ownership of that family home a stable

environment in which to raise children is still the aspiration of

the overwhelming majority of Australians. And all walks of life, whatever

their politics are, whatever their background may be, and providing

a more secure economic base for the foundation of a stable family

environment is a very, very important thing that any government can

do.

And those reductions in interest rates have extended into the small

business area as well and small business is now enjoying lower interest

rates than it has had for decades. And we have also seen a very high

level of business investment and we have seen significant improvements

in the industrial relations laws of this country. Some sections of

the union movement haven't liked them but the rank and file of

the Australian people have liked them because they have encouraged

workers and their employers to get together at an enterprise level

and to reach agreement that are valuable for the individual enterprise.

And we place very great store on the quality of our economic management

and at a time of international turmoil you don't change the team

in charge when that team has handled the affairs of state so very

effectively and so very competently. And that is the very strong message

that I would give to the Australian people. It is because of the international

economic turmoil that you need a group of people who have got the

runs on board in charge. It's because of that international economic

pressure that you can't experiment with failed policies of deficit

and debt. And it's because of those challenges that you need

to continue to press forward with necessary change and reform.

Now, to some people change and reform can be threatening. To others

it can be very welcome. And the art of good leadership of good statecraft

is to change those things that need changing but to tenaciously defend

and to hold on to those things that oughtn't to be changed. I

believe in changing some things. I believe in hanging onto and preserving

other things. I want to change the things that are holding Australia

back. I want to hang onto those things that are still an expression

of Australian unity and Australian cohesion. And one of those things

that we should hang onto as an expression of Australian cohesion and

Australian unity is the tolerance that Australians have always displayed

towards people from all around the world. And one of the great things

about Australia is that we have accepted people from everywhere in

the world and we have amalgamated and cohered into a united Australian

nation. And I would never like to see Australia lose its instinct

for tolerance and decency towards people from other parts of the world.

Racial tolerance and racial understanding and the equality of treatment

of people, irrespective of their racial background, is one of those

Australian values that we should all fight to defend and preserve.

It's a great Australian value and it's a great Australian

tradition.

Something else that I would like to preserve and defend is this flag

that hangs behind me as an expression ...[audience applauds]....as

an expression of the unity and the history of the Australian nation.

Our Federal system of Government has worked well and we are going

to give it a shot in the arm at our tax reform plan. The centrality

of the family unit has the most cohesive social influence within our

society. That should not only be preserved but it should be strengthened

and encouraged and not denigrated by those forces in the Australian

community. There's nothing old-fashioned about stable families.

There's nothing that's more positive within a community

than strong family and apart from the emotional support they provide

to people they also happen to be the most efficient social welfare

system that mankind has ever devised.

So there are a lot of things that in our society that are good and

are worth preserving and we should unite to defend them. Our tolerance,

the importance of family life, our great national symbols such as

the flag, and our Federal system of Government. Now, they are the

things we ought to keep and those people who come along and say we

want to get rid of them, they ought to be opposed. But on the other

hand there are things that are holding Australia back and just because

getting rid of them involves further change we shouldn't shy

away from that change. And one of those things, of course, and it's

something on everybody's mind at the moment is our present taxation

system. Our present taxation system is creaking and groaning and lurching

towards its last days. And unless we have the honesty and the candour

as a nation to face the need and the reality of the need for fundamental

reform, we are going to lose the economic battle in the years ahead.

Because if you have an inefficient taxation system, you have an inefficient

Australian economy. And, of course, we face challenges from overseas,

but we must press ahead with taxation reform.

Those people who say that because of the Asian turmoil we should stop

reform, are completely wrong. It is because of the Asian challenge

that we must press ahead with taxation reform. We have a taxation

system now that was built on an economy that was overwhelmingly based

on manufacturing industry in the 1930s. We have an indirect tax system

that has no application to service industries at all, yet 65 per cent

of the Australian economy is now services. And if we don't do

something about repairing or modernising our indirect taxation system,

we will not have the resources in the future to provide the welfare

support, the hospitals, the roads, the schools, the police services

that our community needs.

I want to take on the argument advanced by some people in the welfare

sector – and I stress some – because there are very divided

views in the welfare sector on this, that in some way the introduction

of a goods and services tax is a threat to welfare services. Can I

say that it offers a life raft to welfare services because what the

introduction of a goods and services tax will do is to provide a more

stable revenue base in the years into the future. The problem with

the present taxation system is that it is leaking. It doesn't

apply to everybody. A lot of people evade it. A lot of people dodge

their responsibilities, and if we can replace the existing wholesale

sales tax system with a comprehensive goods and services tax at a

lower rate, that will provide great assurance into the future that

the money will be there to provide the roads and the schools and the

hospitals and the welfare services. Apart from anything else, out

of our plan, we are going to give a greater guarantee of revenue to

the States and they will get more as the years go by under our plan

and they have the direct responsibility for police, for hospitals,

in the main for roads and for a lot of other social securities, and

of course security, and the primary responsibility for education.

We are arguing taxation reform because it is in the long term interests

of Australia. The debate about taxation is not just about how it affects

you and me but it is how it affects our whole nation and more than

anything else I would like our plan to be supported because it will

strengthen Australia and strengthen the Australian economy. It will

give us a secure revenue base. It will stop the leakage and cheating

and rorting that now occurs. It will reduce the cost of doing business

in this country because under our plan every item, every input item

to the production of a good or service, the tax on that will be fully

rebatable. You can claim it back in full, unlike the present system,

where because of the operation of the cascading effect of the wholesale

tax system, there are many taxes embedded in the costs of producing

goods and services in Australia. It has been estimated that it will

reduce the cost of business by about $10, 000 million a year, and

it will reduce the cost of exports by $4500 million a year. Now, in

a hostile world trading environment, with the Asian economies in a

very fragile situation and every country fighting like crazy to get

its market share, what could be more important than to reduce the

cost of Australian exports, because we've got to export to survive.

We are a trading nation. We have only 18 million people. We can't

seal ourselves off from the rest of the world and hope that we can

just rest contented within our vast continent. What we have to do

is go out and sell and succeed and compete on world markets. Our men

and women who export can do well providing they get the best help

the Government can provide and the best help the Government can provide

is to take the taxes off the back of exporters. And by introducing

a goods and services tax, exports will be GST free and the input costs

will be completely free of taxation. So therefore we'll be giving

a huge kick along to our exporters.

Now I know this change is, in the eyes of some people, big. It is

big. And some people may not think it is easy. But we really have

reached that stage in our history where we can't have the easy

bits without the fundamental reform. You can't hope, as I said

the other night, to play in the grand final without going to training.

You can't hope to present yourself at the HSC without having

studied hard and expect to succeed. And the same thing applies with

fixing our tax system. The easy lazy option is to say: well you can

all have a tax cut and I'll be happy and go we'll away have

a party and that's marvellous. But you can't do that. We

are providing an alcove for a significant personal income tax cuts.

But we are also doing the harder bits. We're also facing the

need to reform the system and that's the issue. Because if you

just give tax cuts and you don't fix the system they'll

disappear like melting snow in the hot sun. They won't last.

It's like building a fancy house on insecure foundations. You've

got to fix the foundations otherwise the house will get rolled over

at the first sign of a storm. They may be old analogies but they remain

true today in relation to taxation as they were in other circumstances.

So ladies and gentlemen, we have reached a stage in our nation's

economic history where compared with most other countries we're

doing very well. We have got low inflation, low interest rates. We've

got our debt down, we've got our Budget back in the balance.

We've generated 300,000 new jobs over the last two-and-a-half

years. We've improved our industrial relations system. But we

still face enormous challenges from overseas and the only way you

can beat them off is to be competitive and strong and you can't

be competitive and strong in the 1990s if you have a 1930s taxation

system. And it's for the sake of Australia's economic strength

more than for the sake of any individual section of the Australian

economy that we put forward this taxation plan. We are not doing it

for this group or that group. We are doing it for the future of the

Australian economy and the future economic strength of the Australian

nation. And I want our tax plan to be judged on what it does for the

entire country. I want it to be judged on the gift that it bequeaths

to future generations of Australians into the 21st century.

Now I do feel very strongly committed to it because I believe it is

in the long term interests of our country. I believe that it will

strengthen our economy. I believe that it will strengthen our families.

The reduction in fuel excise will reduce the costs of transporting

goods around this vast country of ours. Geoffrey Blainey coined that

evocative phrase years ago of the tyranny of distance. And he talked

then of the distance of Australia from Europe but you can equally

talk of the distance between one part of Australia and another. And

if you reduce the cost of carrying goods and services over those vast

distances then I believe you are striking a blow against the tyranny

of distance.

Now ladies and gentleman, Kerry Bartlett has played a very significant

role in shaping the votes and the arguments and the advocacy of the

Government particularly, but not only, in the areas affecting the

Australian economy. I've spoke earlier of his commitment to the

interests of self-funded retirees and one of the things that we've

taken very great care to do in putting together our tax plan is to

ensure that there is adequate support and adequate protection for

the retired section of the Australian community. We've introduced

a 30% tax deduction for the cost of private health insurance to take

effect from January next year. We're introducing a thing called

refundable imputation credits. Sounds complicated but it's not.

If you're a shareholder and your tax rate is less than 36% and

you've got a franked dividend from the company you know exactly

what a refundable imputation credit is. It means that if you pay 20

cents at the margin and 36 is being paid on the share you get 16 refunded

from the taxation office and that's something that you've

never been able to get under the present arrangement. We're going

to abolish something called provision of taxation which has been the

bane of existence of a lot of self-funded retirees and a lot of men

and women in businesses and on the land. And we're also providing

of course for special payments for people 60 years and over of $1000

in relation to their investment income and a further $2000 for self-funded

retirees of pensionable age. And on top of that of course, for all

pensioners there will be an increase in the pension of 4% up front

on the first of July in the year 2000.

And don't believe the scare campaign that that is inadequate

because it is not. It is 1.5% or more ahead of the projected increase

in the cost of living which across the economy we calculate to be

1.9% as a result of the introduction of the goods and services tax.

Some people say that that's too low. I noticed in the papers

this morning that a respected economic intelligence union called ‘Econotech'

released a report through KPMG, the Italian firm, that calculated

at the price effect of a GST was nothing more than 0.9% which is less

than half the calculation made by the Federal Treasury. We think the

Treasury calculation is right. It's not a political calculation,

it's an economic calculation.

So my friends, can I finish by saying that it is a great pleasure

to be back in the Hawkesbury electorate. As somebody who grew up in

Sydney and who spent a good deal of time over the years because of

family connections in areas around the Castle Hills and Pennant Hills

and Baulkham Hills. It's an area that is not unfamiliar to me

and I've visited on many occasions. And Kerry holds an electorate

that straddles different parts of New South Wales and different parts

of the Blue Mountains and of course the Hawkesbury. He represents

it very well, he represents it very effectively and he is a person

of this electorate for this electorate and I very, very warmly commend

you to him and I ask you to give him every encouragement and every

support as your federal member.

Thank you very much.

[ends]

10950