PM Transcripts

Transcripts from the Prime Ministers of Australia

Howard, John

Period of Service: 11/03/1996 - 03/12/2007
Release Date:
26/03/1998
Release Type:
Interview
Transcript ID:
10749
Released by:
  • Howard, John Winston
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRIME MINISTER THE HON JOHN HOWARD MP DOORSTOP INTERVIEW RSL HEADQUARTERS, CANBERRA

E&OE...............................................

JOURNALIST:

Mr Howard, how valuable is this pension rise for the war widows?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, it's a full passing on, beyond our election commitment,

of a $6.80 a fortnight increase for all war widows throughout Australia,

of which there are about 100,000. We have linked the pension to 25

per cent of male average weekly ordinary time earnings and we've

decided, although it wasn't part of our commitment to do so,

to go beyond that and to extend this increase to war widows. And it's

a mark of the appreciation that Australia feels towards mainly women,

but not all women. There are some men who are beneficiaries of this

- those people who either died in war or have since died. And it's

an act of national gratitude and a token that we should always remain

very grateful and in debt to those who lost their loved ones in defence

of our country.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Howard, the Premiers would say that these are the sort of people

who would suffer from the Medicare stand-off. Did they express any

concerns about that or nursing homes, topics like that?

PRIME MINISTER:

No, they didn't.

JOURNALIST:

Prime Minister, how do you respond to Donald McDonald's criticism

that the Government hasn't liaised enough with the National Party

on guns and Telstra?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, we liaise with everybody. As far as guns are concerned, we had

an agreement and all I'm doing is upholding the agreement that

all the governments made. And I just say again that I will not compromise

in any way on that uniform agreement. The Australian people want it

in force, to the letter, in full, without qualification. That is all

I'm doing. I'm not trying to change it. I'm not the

bloke who's trying to change the agreement. I think others are

trying to nibble away at the edges, but I'm not. And I don't

regard it as a minor matter. I regard it as a very important matter.

The gun culture is something we want to keep out of Australia. We

don't want dangerous weapons easily available to people in this

country. The gun culture is something that is abhorrent to Australians

and I will do all in my power to stop it coming into this country

and I don't care who criticises it.

JOURNALIST:

But does it reflect renewed tensions within the Coalition?

PRIME MINISTER:

No, it doesn't. Every so often you get a bit of a salvo like

that. I'm not the least bit concerned about it. I have very good

relations with the National Party and they with me and we're

a very strong Coalition. You couldn't have a better Deputy Prime

Minister than Tim Fischer. He's a great fighter for the bush

and a great fighter for the Nats but he works very closely with me.

And I regard what the President said as the normal from periodic comments,

which you would expect in a Coalition which has a lively relationship.

JOURNALIST:

Could APEC be doing more in Asia? Do you agree with Mr Keating's

view?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well, I haven't read the speech.

JOURNALIST:

Well, do you think APEC's had a big enough role, I mean...?

PRIME MINISTER:

I think APEC's done a good job. But APEC is an organisation that's

dedicated to expanding trade. It is not an international financial

institution. I think it's a confusion in the former Prime Minister's

mind about the respective roles. It's the role of the IMF to

buttress the financial system. It's the role of APEC to promote

free trade within the region. They are two quite different roles.

JOURNALIST:

Prime Minister, are you tempted to pull the double dissolution trigger?

PRIME MINISTER:

It's a beautiful morning here in Canberra. It's autumn.

Canberra is at its most lovely in autumn and I enjoy the ambience

of the place. An election is a long way from my mind. But what is

not from my mind is the 50,000 jobs that have been prevented - the

50,000 jobs that have been destroyed by the Labor Party's destruction

of this very sensible bill. Once again the Labor Party has set its

face against small business. Small business has told us that if this

law had gone through, 50,000 new jobs in Australia could be created

because the fear in the hearts of small business about the present

law would be removed and they would be embolden to take on new staff.

So it's a simple choice - the Labor Party wants to destroy jobs

in small business, we want to promote them.

Thank you.

[Ends]

10749